Win Back Campaigns – How Long Do You Wait?
Marketing campaigns have many uses – but they ALWAYS have a
use. In a well-crafted, innovative marketing campaign contains a call to action
that resonates with the audience and drives them to be part of your product. If
you are canny with your marketing, well segmented email lists are aplenty in
your databases, and you have a choice of demographics to target.
Return Path have uncovered some great research that helps
keep your databases lean and productive, if you choose to listen what they say.
Much effort is put into collecting email addresses, but not as much effort is
put into keeping those lists performing at peak capacity, and even less is
known about keeping them relevant and how long they are productive.
Email marketing is economical and effective, and relatively
easy to use. You will have some demographics in a, ‘Shut up and take my money’,
database, but what about the others? How many of them need a seminal ‘win back’
email to galvanise them into action? Then how long do you wait for them to call
before consigning them to the ‘lost in cyber space’ list? It’s a tough
question…
… now here’s the answer.
PATIENCE IS A VIRTUE
According to the company Return Path, who analyzed 300
million email messages sent by well-known brands to over 100 million consumers,
many marketers are giving up too early. On top of that, Brands from different
industries sending out these emails were also choosing to drop subscribers at
random, stopping sending emails to 4% of subscribers even though it appeared
that 85% were not actually active.
In both cases research bailed out the fact that your mother
was right – patience is a virtue.
The study reads:
Approximately 12% of all
win-back messages were read, typically within a few days of delivery. However,
as many as 45% of recipients later engaged with the sender’s email program,
taking an average of 57 days – nearly two months – to read additional messages.
Let’s look at what that means in a real life application.
A marketer’s goal may be that they want an open rate within a few days
of delivery, so may mark an account as ‘inactive’ after that small of a window.
If 45% of recipients engage with the email originator within 57 days, 45% of
those accounts are not dormant – they’re just not opening their emails very
quickly.
If anyone promised you an email open and success rate of 45% I am
guessing you would jump at it. In that case, the chances are you already have
it; you’re just switching off your metrics or deleting accounts before they
have a chance to think about it and answer.
In this age where ‘instant’ in ‘in’, people still need time to think
and compare before committing. Give them that time. Do not cast someone off
because they don’t read their emails as often as you would like them to, cast
them off because they aren’t engaging at all after you’ve given them some time
to think. And don’t be tempted to hang onto what you perceive to be ‘good’
accounts; if they are not active, they are not a good account. Move them out
and maybe, just maybe, you’ll move someone in that will be much more productive.
GOOD THINGS COME TO MARJETERS THAT WAIT
Return Path suggests that 90 days is the magic number for evaluation.
After a win back email is sent watch your audience carefully, the first 9 days
is usually the time you get the most activity, but for the highest activity
wait for 60 days before making any productivity decisions, and 90 days for any
culling decisions.
The study also uncovered that Win Back databases also needed to be
segmented for best effect – by mailbox provider. The study said:
“The findings show
that mailbox providers’ definitions of inactivity, and their tolerance for
inactivity before filtering messages, are different enough to necessitate
customized win-back campaign formulas.”
What that means is that each mailbox provider had its own
metrics for abandoned mail and spam filtering, so a different subject line or
content could make all the difference to open rate for some providers. Universal
subject line success were ‘Miss You’ and ‘Come Back’, but it may take some
investigation to find out what works for your demographic.
It appears that as far as the open rate and read rate for
different providers are concerned the results are also varied. AOL had the
highest read rate at 23 percent. The average overall read-rate was 14 percent,
with Gmail subscribers at 16 percent and Yahoo subscribers at 15 percent. This
could have a lot to do with the metrics they use for abandoned mail, but gives
you a good insight into what to expect.
Win Back emails are a great way to make your calls to action
profitable for a long time, and makes your email lists work for the maximum
amount of time. With these new benchmarks from Return Path you can monitor your
databases and make them lean, mean, marketing machines – if you give them
enough time to open, read and digest; the result could well be the same whether
you are emailing Mr Tortoise or Mr Hare. Mr Tortoise was right, sometimes slow
and steady really does win the race.
No comments:
Post a Comment